Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+2EuoDhVBdieOKnneFX14SeuRp7z0WG2PSOMJt8ks3qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Shawn Debnath <sdn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:27 AM Shawn Debnath <sdn@amazon.com> wrote:
> We had a quick offline discussion to get on the same page and we agreed
> to move forward with Andres' approach above. Attached is patch v10.
> Here's the overview of the patch:

Thanks.  I will review, and try to rebase my undo patches on top of
this and see what problems I crash into.

> Ran make check-world and repeated the tests described in [1]. The
> numbers show a 12% drop in total time for single run of 1000 clients and
> ~62% drop in total time for 10 parallel runs with 200 clients:

Hmm, good but unexpected.  Will poke at this here.


--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?