On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 2:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > +1, this is at least the third non-obvious miscompilation from gharial.
>
> Is there any evidence that this is a compiler-sourced problem?
> Maybe it is, but it's sure not obvious to me (he says, eyeing his
> buildfarm animals with even older gcc versions).
Sorry for the ambiguity -- I have no evidence of miscompilation. My
"just BTW" paragraph was a reaction to the memory of the last couple
of times Noah and I wasted hours chasing red herrings on this system,
which is pretty demotivating when looking into an unexplained failure.
On a more practical note, I don't have access to the BF database right
now. Would you mind checking if "latch already owned" has occurred on
any other animals?
