Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+fd4k6sjZvEVaoMDEw92AdHRKBmXXvOWWUHFZKk5UsBdbjA2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 03:39, Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for updated patches.  I verified my all reported issues and all are fixed in v36 patch set.
>
> Below are some review comments:
> 1.
> +   /* cap by max_parallel_maintenace_workers */
> +   parallel_workers = Min(parallel_workers, max_parallel_maintenance_workers);
>
> Here, spell of max_parallel_maintenace_workers is wrong.  (correct: max_parallel_maintenance_workers)
>
> 2.
> + * size of stats for each index.  Also, this function   Since currently we don't support parallel vacuum
> + * for autovacuum we don't need to care about autovacuum_work_mem
>
> Here, I think, 1st line should be changed because it is not looking correct as grammatically.

Thank you for reviewing and testing this patch. I'll incorporate your
comments in the next version patch.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c