Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date
Msg-id CA+fd4k606sc9y-hcmyqSRdEZMoa6uMAHSLFCdFa4bC_W4FkbwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 13:56, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-09 22:57, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> > +    <listitem>
> > +     <para>
> > +      Parallelized vacuuming of B-tree indexes
> > +     </para>
> > +    </listitem>
>
> I don't think B-tree indexes are relevant here.  AFAICT, this feature
> applies to all indexes.
>

Yes, parallel vacuum applies to all types of indexes provided by
PostgreSQL binary, and other types of indexes also can use it.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Retry Cached Remote Connections for postgres_fdw in case remote backend gets killed/goes away
Next
From: "lchch1990@sina.cn"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unnecessary delay in streaming replication due to replay lag