Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date
Msg-id 63d3f3aa-e42d-dd3d-643c-2e91a13a0762@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/15/20 5:22 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 13:56, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-09-09 22:57, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> +    <listitem>
>>> +     <para>
>>> +      Parallelized vacuuming of B-tree indexes
>>> +     </para>
>>> +    </listitem>
>>
>> I don't think B-tree indexes are relevant here.  AFAICT, this feature
>> applies to all indexes.
>>
>
> Yes, parallel vacuum applies to all types of indexes provided by
> PostgreSQL binary, and other types of indexes also can use it.

I'm not sure where I got B-tree from. I've attached a correction.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Force update_process_title=on in crash recovery?