Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 22:58, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-14 07:32, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > -     <entry>Replication slot name used by this WAL receiver</entry>
> > +     <entry>
> > +      Replication slot name used by this WAL receiver.  This is only set if a
> > +      permanent replication slot is set using <xref
> > +      linkend="guc-primary-slot-name"/>.  Otherwise, the WAL receiver may use
> > +      a temporary replication slot (determined by <xref
> > +      linkend="guc-wal-receiver-create-temp-slot"/>), but these are not shown
> > +      here.
> > +     </entry>
> >
> > Now that the slot name is shown even if it's a temp slot the above
> > documentation changes needs to be changed. Other changes look good to
> > me.
>
> committed, thanks

Thank you for committing these patches.

Could you rebase the main patch that adds base backup client as
auxiliary backend process since the previous version patch (v3)
conflicts with the current HEAD?

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services