Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Jorge Solórzano
Subject Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Date
Msg-id CA+cVU8OgZoEK7SVMyiKgMfrZpLEooF0n8ZLyRKKBMgNsWnEyjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Hi Dave, the merging (review) of PRs has been a bit slow, is there anything that I can do, to make the process faster?

Jorge Solórzano


On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
Fair enough I"ll look at the PR's you have approved.


On 5 October 2017 at 09:39, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
The idea was to get people to review. How does cutting a version now help us ?


​Some PRs are waiting for 42.2.0​, so I suppose that cut 42.1.5 now and start merging those features for 42.2.0 makes sense...

If there will be no 42.1.5, then why have many PRs on hold?

Waiting to get people to review is not an option since there are PRs that for months haven't received any input. And the ultimate decision is on the maintainers, I have personally reviewed some PRs and give my approval but the PRs are still on hold.


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Could pgsql jdbc support pool reauthentication?
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?