On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com> wrote:
....
> Just a suggestion. The first query is not really needed.
> You can simply do:
> second query (B):
>
> SELECT id
> , ...
> FROM events
> WHERE id > MIN(ID)
> AND id <= MAX(ID)
> AND ...
>
> See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/functions-aggregate.html
> MAX and MIN functions
Are you sure? ( http://sqlfiddle.com/#!17/7805a/3 )
In fact your link, in the first paragraph, points to
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/tutorial-agg.html which,
near the end ( 2nd paragraph from the end, I think its called next to
last in English, but not sure if penultimate is the correct word, like
in Spanish ), states:
"Thus, the WHERE clause must not contain aggregate functions; it makes
no sense to try to use an aggregate to determine which rows will be
inputs to the aggregates."
Francisco Olarte.
