[GENERAL] Question about jsonb and data structures - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Emilie Laffray
Subject [GENERAL] Question about jsonb and data structures
Date
Msg-id CA+Zmw30dA=eGCqF0eXoVVm2ye3uqvKR7D1oM5Q+3E_RBdS8TOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Question about jsonb and data structures  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hello,

I have been playing with Postgresql recently with a large table and I have started looking at reducing the number of rows in that table. 
One idea to reduce the actual size, I thought I would "compress" the data structure into a JSON object (more on that later).
The table is pretty straightforward in itself
other_id integer
type_id integer
label_id integer
rank_id integer
value real

and the goal is to move to a data structure where we have
other_id integer
value jsonb

There are many things in the table that is not optimal for legacy reasons and I can't just get rid of them. 

I looked at several json object data structure to see if I could make it work notably
[{"type":1,"label":1,"rank":1,"value":.5},{"type":1,"label":2,"rank":1,"value":.25}]
{"1":{"1":{"rank":1,"value":.5},"2":{"rank":1,"value":.25}}}

For better or worse, the first one would be the best for me as I can do a simple query like this using the GIN index built on top of value:
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE value @> '[{"type":1,"rank":1,"label":2}]'

Effectively, I would want to extract the value corresponding to my condition using simple SQL aka not having to write a function extracting the json. 

The experiment on the second data structure shows that it is not as convenient as I may need to perform search on either type, label, rank and various combinations of the fields.

Am I missing something?

Thanks in advance,
Emilie Laffray

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Schedule
Next
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Question about jsonb and data structures