Re: [pgadmin-hackers] inconsistent sql template path resolving - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Atira Odhner
Subject Re: [pgadmin-hackers] inconsistent sql template path resolving
Date
Msg-id CA+Vc24ogO87cYEoF5U9rNJYWp4YTcmo+n3SNMQF5sfJi1HhdiA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [pgadmin-hackers] inconsistent sql template path resolving  (Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Nevermind, I think I figured it out. Some templates are resolved on 9.5_plus etc.

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io> wrote:
Hello fellow pgadmin hackers,

I was taking a look at some version-checking code and I noticed some inconsistencies in how we are picking what sql file to run: 

ver = self.manager.version
if ver >= 90200:
self.template_path = 'exclusion_constraint/sql/9.2_plus'
elif ver >= 90100:
self.template_path = 'exclusion_constraint/sql/9.1_plus'
versus:

ver = self.manager.version
if ver >= 90600:
self.template_path = 'exclusion_constraint/sql/9.6_plus'
elif ver >= 90200:
self.template_path = 'exclusion_constraint/sql/9.2_plus'
elif ver >= 90100:
self.template_path = 'exclusion_constraint/sql/9.1_plus'

In this particular example the sql template file contents for 9.6+ and 9.1+ are identical so it wouldn't have any effect, but in general is there some reason this might be intentional? I'm planning on refactoring this code to: 
self.template_path = resolve(self.manager, 'exclusion_constraint')
and making all the places behave the same way.


Thanks,

Tira


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Atira Odhner
Date:
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] inconsistent sql template path resolving
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP)