Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLSXybG8gf_ntSGO4iMmYg6yacjvO+VoF=wBjLmCbcjMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback  (<furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
List pgsql-hackers
On 17 October 2014 09:55,  <furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:

>>A new parameter to send feedback should be called --feedback

>>A second parameter to decide whether to fsync should be called --fsync
>
> I think keep using "--reply-fsync" and "--fsync-interval" is better than make new options.
> Thought?

We already have hot_standby_feedback, so using the name feedback is best idea.

I am suggesting that we send feedback even if we do not fsync, to
allow the master to track our progress. Hence the name of the second
parameter was just fsync.

So both names were suggested because of links to those terms already
being used for similar reasons elsewhere in Postgres.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING