2012/1/11 Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>:
> On 08-01-2012 11:59, Satoshi Nagayasu / Uptime Technologies, LLC. wrote:
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored log file "000000080000000000000046" from archive
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: recoverying 000000080000000000000046
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored log file "000000080000000000000047" from archive
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: recoverying 000000080000000000000047
>>> cp: cannot stat `/backups/archlog/000000080000000000000048': No such file or directory
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:37 JST] 16758: LOG: could not restore file "000000080000000000000048" from archive
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:37 JST] 16758: LOG: attempting to look into pg_xlog
>>> [2011-12-08 15:14:37 JST] 16758: LOG: recoverying 000000080000000000000048
>>
> What about just 'restored log file "000000080000000000000048" from pg_xlog'
> instead of the last two messages? If you can't read from pg_xlog emit 'could
> not restore file "000000080000000000000048" from pg_xlog'.
Yes, simple is better.
We already have a message if the file is not present, we just need one
if we switch to using pg_xlog.
Please look at this.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
