Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLDVdWn1wXZSQ1ATwZa=O+Z_+dGS48iBrQ151ojfYwM+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/11 10:34 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, we have four potential paths regarding recovery.conf:
>>>
>>> 1) Break backwards compatibility entirely, and stop supporting recovery.conf as a trigger file at all.
>>
>> Note that is exactly what I have suggested when using "standby" mode
>> from pg_ctl.
>
> I wasn't clear on that from the description of your proposal.  So are
> you suggesting that, if we start postgresql with "pg_ctl standby" then
> recovery.conf would not behave as a trigger file?

Yes

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?