On 22 May 2012 18:56, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I'm not arguing that we don't have users who would like interdatabase
> queries, especially when they port applications from MySQL or MSSQL. We
> have a lot of such users.
Lots and lots, yes.
> However, we *also* have a lot of users who
> would like to treat separate databases as virtual private instances of
> Postgres, and there's no way to satisfy both goals. We have to choose
> one route or the other.
That's only true if you try to satisfy both goals at once, which I'm
not suggesting. So I believe that proposition to be false.
However, given sufficient people speaking against it, I'll leave this idea.
Though I'd suggest that people on this thread spend a little quality
time with FDWs. It's a great direction but there's a long way to go
yet. Sorry to Laurenz, who's done a great job so far on the Oracle
FDW.
> I personally see the isolation case as the more necessary because there
> are several workarounds for the "inter-database queries" issue
I also want that, per my original post.
> An alternative idea -- and one which could be deployed a lot faster --
> is to come up with a tool which makes it easy to migrate an entire
> database into a separate schema or set of schemas in an existing
> database. And improvements to manage schema visility/path better, I
> suppose.
Yes, it is possible to improve things there also.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
