Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nML68fc+uCM=mois8xngoKZUwtOJVbvM6iFY3vWVS0qnVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
>> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
>> compatibility.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
> of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.

Thanks for the review.

Will follow up on suggestions.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings