Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJBuq+az3CkX=1sSZ8kRW05=dFBcLF-LtmFybn0LcN5og@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
>>> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
>>> compatibility.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
>> of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Will follow up on suggestions.

I'll add this in as a separate item after commit.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf