Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwH1ot128dZwOd_yhRxNJMf2ME8qEWP1ftR7SkSyOkaCdg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
> compatibility.

Fair enough.

The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kerem Kat
Date:
Subject: (PATCH) Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)