On 29 January 2013 16:27, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.
>> pg_ctl promote -m fast will skip the checkpoint at end of recovery so that we
>> can achieve very fast failover when the apply delay is low. Write new WAL record
>> XLOG_END_OF_RECOVERY to allow us to switch timeline correctly for downstream log
>> readers. If we skip synchronous end of recovery checkpoint we request a normal
>> spread checkpoint so that the window of re-recovery is low.
>
> When I tested this feature, I encountered the following FATAL message.
>
> FATAL: highest timeline 1 of the primary is behind recovery timeline 2
>
> Is this an intentional behavior or bug?
Tough one that.
> What I did in my test is:
>
> 1. Set up one master (A), one standby (B), one cascade standby (C)
> 2. After running pgbench -i -s 10, I promoted the standby (B) with fast mode
> 3. Then, I shut down the server (B) with immediate mode after it has been
> brought up to the master before end-of-recovery checkpoint has not been
> completed.
> 4. Restart the server (B).
> 5. After the standby (C) established the replication connection with (B),
> I got the above FATAL messages repeatedly.
Where do you get the errors, which server? The above doesn't contain a
promote command, so how does this make it fail.
Please show me the test case in more detail.
> Promoting (B) increments the timeline ID to 2 and generates the timeline
> history file. But after restarting (B), its timeline ID is reset to 1
> unexpectedly.
> This seems to be the cause of the problem.
>
> To address this problem, we should switch to new timeline ID whenever
> we read the XLOG_END_OF_RECOVERY even if it's a crash recovery?
We do. Do you see a problem with that code? There is no conditional recovery.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
