On 18 March 2013 00:50, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 3/17/13 1:41 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> So I'm now moving towards commit using a CRC algorithm. I'll put in a
>> feature to allow algorithm be selected at initdb time, though that is
>> mainly a convenience to allow us to more easily do further testing on
>> speedups and whether there are any platform specific regressions
>> there.
>
> That sounds reasonable. As I just posted, I'm hoping Ants can help make a
> pass over a CRC16 version, since his one on the Fletcher one seemed very
> productive. If you're spending time looking at this, I know I'd prefer to
> see you poking at the WAL related aspects instead. There are more of us who
> are capable of crunching CRC code than the list of people who have practice
> at WAL changes like you do.
Just committed the first part, which was necessary refactoring.
I see at least 2 further commits here:
* Next part is the checksum patch itself, with some checksum calc or
other (mostly unimportant from a code perspective, since the actual
algorithm is just a small isolated piece of code.
* Further commit(s) to set the agreed checksum algorithm and/or tune it.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
