On 18 October 2012 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But I'd want to see a pretty
> bulletproof argument why overriding *only* nextval is sufficient
> (and always will be) before accepting a hook for just nextval. If we
> build an equivalent amount of functionality piecemeal it's going to
> be a lot uglier than if we recognize we need this type of concept
> up front.
We discussed that we need only nextval() and setval() elsewhere, but
adding others is fairly cheap so we can chew on that when we have a
patch to discuss.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
