On 21 May 2013 15:29, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or, what about using CHECKPOINT_FORCE and just printing "force"?
> Currently that checkpoint always starts because of existence of the
> end-of-recovery record, but I think we should ensure that the checkpoint
> always starts by using that flag.
This would mean we can't use the secondary checkpoint record, but we
already gave that up so should be OK.
Three people, three suggestions; so I will agree to this suggestion so
we can get on with it.
--Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
