On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Samba <saasira@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think one year is sufficient time for any product/feature to be thoroughly
> tested for all its strengths and weaknesses; so would it be too much to ask
> the vast postgres customer base about their experiences with streaming
> replication, the good, the bad; and perhaps the best and the ugly too? It
> would be great if customers can give their identity (employer info) but not
> necessary though.
Maybe its not clear in the documentation but the streaming replication
feature isn't just one year old.
The core parts of it are actually 7 years old, and they are definitely
battle tested. The slightly newer parts changed the transport logic to
stream rather than use file-by-file.
The features relevant here are Point in Time Recovery (8.0), Warm
Standby (8.2), pg_standby (8.3), Bgwriter during recovery (8.4)
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
