Re: Deprecating RULES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Deprecating RULES
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJyzFCGtSADx7ocxi6ezYm0OOyRrE04dMxMO0B=4yKWbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deprecating RULES  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Deprecating RULES  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Deprecating RULES  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12 October 2012 10:08, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> As regards cost/benefit analysis, this is a low importance feature,
>> but then that is why I proposed a low effort fix that is flexible to
>> the needs of users affected.
>
> Is there any feature that is more loathed and more narrowly used than
> rules?

I doubt it.

Would you or someone else be able to come up with some words of
caution for us to put in the manual that would be helpful to
developers?

There isn't even a list of caveats for rules.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: chinnaobi
Date:
Subject: Re: How to avoid base backup in automated failover
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Global Sequences