On 8 June 2012 18:01, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
>> What would be much better, IMHO, is if the number of retained
>> segments could ratchet down when the system is idle, eventually
>> reaching a state where we keep only one segment beyond the one
>> currently in use.
>
> I'm a bit sceptical about this. It seems to me that you wouldn't actually
> be able to do anything useful with the conserved space, since postgres
> could re-claim it at any time. At which point it'd better be available,
> or your whole cluster comes to a screeching halt...
Agreed, I can't really see why you'd want to save space when the
database is slow at the expense of robustness and reliability when the
database speeds up.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
