On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Actually, for the future, it might be useful to have a "state" column,
>> that holds the idle/in transaction/running status, instead of the
>> tools having to parse the query text to get that information...
>
> +1 for doing it this way. Splitting "current_query" into "query" and
> "state" would be more elegant and easier to use all around.
Why not leave it exactly as it is, and add a previous_query column?
That gives you exactly what you need without breaking anything.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
