On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training &
Services
