Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJK89jFTKCmegnoKRShaSTamFs4RLr6Fyshu1R05htq4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 25.12.2011 15:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe that.  Double-writing is a technique to avoid torn
>> pages, but it requires a checksum to work.  This chicken-and-egg
>> problem requires the checksum to be implemented first.
>
>
> I don't think double-writes require checksums on the data pages themselves,
> just on the copies in the double-write buffers. In the double-write buffer,
> you'll need some extra information per-page anyway, like a relfilenode and
> block number that indicates which page it is in the buffer.

How would you know when to look in the double write buffer?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes