Re: "Value locking" Wiki page - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJ7zsUwTKu3jnC+_pu7gku9etikp9HW5X8u6BAxgGsyCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Value locking" Wiki page  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
List pgsql-hackers
On 1 October 2014 13:43, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:

>> That does sound interesting, but I am concerned the semantics may cause
>> issues.
>>
>> If I go to insert a row for 'UK' and find an existing row for
>> 'Europe', do we really want to update the population of Europe to be
>> the population of the UK, simply because the UK and Europe have an
>> exclusion conflict?
>
> Clearly not, but you might want to insert the tuple to another table
> instead, or skip it altogether. Or you might want to UPDATE Europe into
> Continental Europe, and then insert the row for UK.

Not trying to catch you out, just trying to make sure we don't make
technical decisions based upon unachievable ideas.

I can't see value in having upsert work against exclusion constraint
indexes; thus this only needs to work for btrees, or similar exact
indexes.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgcrypto: PGP armor headers
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: "Value locking" Wiki page