Re: Another unexpected behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+tKNQyAv9=nQcpiT3B4eJZssQhrdOfP3fsiBWzWZxqnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Samuel Hwang <samuel@replicon.com>)
Responses Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Shianmiin <Shianmiin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Samuel Hwang <samuel@replicon.com> wrote:

> The real question is that why PostgreSQL behaves differently than
> other major DBMS. IMHO, doing checking at set operation boundary is
> more appropriate than at row boundary.

The real question is why anyone would actually perform that kind of
UPDATE. It doesn't really make much sense to increment a PK value.

PostgreSQL is good at supporting things people want and need, so
differences do exist in places that are fairly low priority.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Next
From: "Rob Richardson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Another unexpected behaviour