Re: Do we need so many hint bits? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+Nbvjxtn43WoD8KznMAHPoMKX4mBQC_PxwERa=Y6kbQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we need so many hint bits?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 18 November 2012 08:52, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> The difference here is that we still need to check visibility of each
> tuple, but that can be a very cheap check and never involves clog, nor
> does it dirty the page. Tuple access is reasonably expensive in
> comparison with a clog-less check on tuple xmin against snapshot xmin,
> so the extra work is negligible.

The attached *partial* patch shows how the tuple checks would work.

This should fit in neatly with the vismap skip code you've got already.

Looks to me possible to skip the all-vis hint completely, as you
suggest, plus avoid repeated checks of VM or clog.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Next
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: 9.3 pg_archivecleanup broken?