Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+M-+mG6NwfTTd0aRJd86C6CM842e3waR974G0=gaXk6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:

> Well, as someone who sets up and admins replication for a bunch of
> clients, here's what I'd like to see:

Everyone has their own set of requirements. I've tried hard to fuse
those together into a useful proposal, listening to all. Please bear
in mind that I make my living in exactly the same way you do, so you
must surely be aware I do this solely in the common interest.

I don't force you to accept that proposal, but challenging it does
require somebody to step up to the plate and work out a better
detailed proposal rather than just restate what they personally want.
I don't rule out out that a better proposal exists and would be
incredibly happy if someone worked out the design, wrote it up and
desnaggled it.

We can always do nothing, which is a safe and viable option.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)