Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+CsgYaH6EfJTWy+YrEJG4Ygzp9Q5hCG3vvCBZeuGEGhA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that
> something's missing.

I'm quoting you completely out of context here, but yes, something is missing.

We can't credibly do one test on usage count in shared buffers and
then start talking about how buffer management is all wrong.

My own patch requires more test evidence before we can commit it,
which is why I hadn't published it before now. I'll endeavour to do
that now its on the table.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame