Re: Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+8sGAOrrTSfSYwSJn3jKVEkXNmSBkLALw22p2Vombhbg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> In 9.0 (as in earlier versions) a former standby host has to do a full
> checkpoint before becoming available as an independent database instance
> in either switchover or failover scenarios.
>
> For most combinations of of bigger than minimal shared buffers and
> non-memory-speed disks this can take from several seconds to tens of
> minutes on busy systems.

For switchover, you issue a checkpoint first, to reduce this time as
much as possible.

> Is the pre-activation checkpoint still required in 9.1 ?

Yes, but I've found a way to remove them in 9.2 and will be patching that soon.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumlo patch
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API