On 21 March 2013 18:27, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> This may be true, but so what? We don't generally restrict changing
> GUC settings on the grounds that people probably won't wish to do so
> because it isn't useful. We restrict it in situations where it is not
> technically possible or is liable to be harmful.
>
> I'm of the opinion that we should try to keep as many things
> PGC_USERSET as we possibly can. It makes life easier for DBAs.
Only one setting will be best for the whole cluster, so neither the
user nor the DBA gains if a user sets this to a different value than
the one that has been determined to be optimal.
Since we wait while holding the lock it is actually harmful to
everyone if anybody sets a stupid value and might even be considered a
denial of service attack.
So there is a very good reason to make this SIGHUP, not just a whim.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
