Re: Finer Extension dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobzG0js1a-d8=fHuNRVHR_x5DCnfo+pd3-khqgmO=Ci5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Finer Extension dependencies  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Finer Extension dependencies  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote:
> Quickly reviewed the patch and found some issues.
>
> - There are some mixture of pg_extension_feature and pg_extension_feature"s"
> - The doc says pg_extension_feature"s" has four columns but it's not true.
> - Line 608 is bad. In the loop, provides_itself is repeatedly changed
> to true and false and I guess that's not what you meant.
> - Line 854+, you can fold two blocks into one.  The two blocks are
> similar and by giving provides list with list_make1 when
> control->provides  == NIL you can do it in one block.
> - s/trak/track/
> - Line 960, you missed updating classId for dependency.
>
> That's pretty much from me.  I just looked at the patch and have no
> idea about grand architecture.  Marking Waiting on Author.

Dimitri, are you going to post an updated patch for this CF?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Inline Extension
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding shutdown checkpoint at failover