Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoby-gU1Uke+z87AJw5FPtdhzmWy=eaomH_4zXGck=jE0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That leads me to wonder: Have you measured different, lower, number of
> buffer mapping locks? 128 locks is, if we'd as we should align them
> properly, 8KB of memory. Common L1 cache sizes are around 32k...

Amit has some results upthread showing 64 being good, but not as good
as 128.  I haven't verified that myself, but have no reason to doubt
it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction