On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the specific answer here should look like. Simply
>> having a
>> CREATE FUNCTION ... PARALLEL_IS_FINE flag is not entirely satisfying,
>> because
>> the rules are liable to loosen over time.
>
> Having a flag would be enough to control parallelism, but cannot we also
> determine if
> the execution of a function can be shipped safely to a worker based on its
> volatility
> only? Immutable functions are presumably safe as they do not modify the
> database state
> and give always the same result, volatile and stable functions are
> definitely not safe.
> For such reasons, it would be better to keep things simple and rely on
> simple rules to
> determine if a given expression can be executed safely on a backend worker.
In the part of the text you didn't quote, Noah explained why not all
immutable functions are parallel-safe.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
