Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobt7gJ5pR2tJjUvFGmH1zW4PncL2MrM=1QuRWJP-eHx1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Why?  It would likely be a significant amount of effort and added overhead,
> to accomplish no obviously-useful goal.
>
> Note that all the temp schemas are made as owned by the bootstrap
> superuser, so there is no real argument to be made that people might
> be expecting they should be able to delete them.

Hmm, well maybe you're right.  Just seems like an odd wart.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Next
From: Shawn Debnath
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue