On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:33 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, having it match the way it works makes sense. Would you feel
> comfortable with an intermediate step (queueing up that as a larger
> change) changing the clause to something like "indexes will still have
> to be rebuilt unless the system can guarantee that the sort order is
> proven to be unchanged" (with appropriate wordsmithing to be a bit
> less verbose if possible)?
Yeah, that seems fine. It's arguable how much detail we should go into
here - but a statement of the form you propose is not misleading, and
that's what seems most important to me.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
