Re: Portability issues in shm_mq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Portability issues in shm_mq
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobppcVeeUQHtv4u83ey-LzXE0-yhWD5CG8m11igA5HCgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Portability issues in shm_mq  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The thing I kind of like about this approach is that it makes the code
>> fully independent of the relationship between MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF and
>> sizeof(Size).
>
> Yeah.  If it's not costing us much to support both cases, let's do so.

OK, committed as posted.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimum supported version of Python?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_archivecleanup bug