Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoboZn3ppQxeQ5QnzetFUn1bECkXgvF5pkXyj=912tkTcg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
>> code under src/tools/ in our main repo.  Is anyone really
>> seriously against that?
>
> I think it would be better to have it separate.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger