On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 6:53 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thinking again, there is already a code in XLogDecodeNextRecord() to
> error out if XLP_FIRST_IS_CONTRECORD is set so probably we don't need
> to do anything else and the previous patch with modified assert should
> just work fine?
Yeah, that looks right to me. I'm inclined to commit your patch with
some changes to wording of the comments. I'm also inclined not to
back-patch, since we don't know that this breaks anything for existing
users of the xlogreader facility.
If anyone doesn't want this committed or does want it back-patched,
please speak up.
Thanks,
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
