Re: splitting *_desc routines - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: splitting *_desc routines
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobmW9rcYr7YCY5dqeCeA1tE7PZz+g5DiKYQS4Kq39urVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: splitting *_desc routines  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: splitting *_desc routines  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'd put these in a separate directory to avoid annoyance. Transam is
> already too large.

+1.  A further advantage of that is that it means that that everything
in that new directory will be intended to end up as
all-separately-compilable, which should make it easier to remember
what the rules are, and easier to design an automated framework that
continuously verifies that it still works that way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Logical to physical page mapping