Re: advance local xmin more aggressively - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: advance local xmin more aggressively
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobmH6rR6CKUqxN_jwCNq7A=W2v78K-KCa+GpSeB8PYejg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: advance local xmin more aggressively  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: advance local xmin more aggressively
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
>> committed, and fixing those bugs.
> So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?

Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find
the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for
that.  But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody
notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: __attribute__ for non-gcc compilers