On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:15 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >- It looks to me like you need to give significantly more thought to
> > the proper way of adjusting the relfilenode-related test cases in
> > alter_table.out.
>
> It seems to me that this test case is just testing whether the
> table/child table are rewritten or not after the alter table. And for
> that it is comparing the oid with the relfilenode, now that is not
> possible so I think it's quite reasonable to just compare the current
> relfilenode with the old relfilenode and if they are same the table is
> not rewritten. So I am not sure why the original test case had two
> cases 'own' and 'orig'. With respect to this test case they both have
> the same meaning, in fact comparing old relfilenode with current
> relfilenode is better way of testing than comparing the oid with
> relfilenode.
I think you're right. However, I don't really like OTHER showing up in
the output, because that looks like a string that was chosen to be
slightly alarming, especially given that it's in ALL CAPS. How about
if we change 'ORIG' to 'new'?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
