Re: tableam vs. TOAST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: tableam vs. TOAST
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobgLY3nwOTeiUXtENe0CRYtAaSQTLk7B3pzeJefG5Dk2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tableam vs. TOAST  (Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: tableam vs. TOAST
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:49 AM Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
While testing the Toast patch(PG+v7 patch) I found below server crash.
System configuration:
VCPUs: 4, RAM: 8GB, Storage: 320GB

This issue is not frequently reproducible, we need to repeat the same testcase multiple times.

I wonder if this is an independent bug, because the backtrace doesn't look like it's related to the stuff this is changing. Your report doesn't specify whether you can also reproduce the problem without the patch, which is something that you should always check before reporting a bug in a particular patch.
 
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Global Index
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Global Index