Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobfvQzP6qnnYVBR1vojDmutsbu3yzbCEtgCA0YC__bz-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Are you saying we should do the work now to create a per-transaction
> DSM segment + DSA area + thing that every backend attaches to?

No, I was just thinking you could stuff it into the per-parallel-query
DSM/DSA.  But...

> I didn't think creating backend local hash tables would be a problem
> because it's a vanishingly rare occurrence for the hash table to be
> created at all (ie when you've altered an enum), and if created, to
> have more than a couple of entries in it.

...this is also a fair point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Greg Clough
Date:
Subject: RE: BUG #15008: Need a pause
Next
From: Laurent Martelli
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15008: Need a pause