On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>> No, you're missing my point completely. If we use a flexible options
>> syntax here, then we have to decide on what behavior CREATE OR REPLACE
>> should have for all future options, without knowing what they are yet,
>> or what behavior will be appropriate.
>>
> Hmm. Indeed, it seems to me fair enough reason.
>
> In this syntax case, the only way to clear the security_barrier flag
> is to drop view
> once, then create a view, isn't it?
I was imagining we'd have ALTER VIEW .. [NO] SECURITY or something like that.
> And, is the security_barrier flag still stored within reloptions field?
No. That would be missing the point.
But keep in mind no one else has endorsed my reasoning on this one as yet...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
