Re: Portability issues in TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Portability issues in TAP tests
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobbzLLYV1ikkJnH6U=ELC7wA-xYFqsuA=1MUsVTzSECpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Portability issues in TAP tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 07/21/2014 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I had the same feeling about the Perl on RHEL6 ;-).  The TAP tests
>>> will need to be a great deal more portable than they've proven so far
>>> before they'll really be useful for anything much.  I trust we're
>>> committed to making that happen.
>
>> I'd be rather inclined to remove them from the check-world and
>> installcheck-world targets until we have dealt with the issues people
>> have identified.
>
> I think it would be reasonable to do that in the 9.4 branch, since
> it's a bit hard to argue that the TAP tests are production grade
> at the moment.  We could leave them there in HEAD.

That doesn't do developers who can't run the tests in their
environment much good: most people develop against master.  Maybe
that's the point: to get these fixed.   But it's pretty annoying that
I can no longer do 'make world'.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: parametric block size?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Behavior of "OFFSET -1"