On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I was assuming that we would have *both* per-operation and per-statement
> limits. I can see reasons for having both, I can see why power users
> would want both, but it's going to be overwhelming to casual users.
I don't think so. I think the fact that this is per-gather-node
rather than per-statement right now is basically a defect. Once we
have a per-statement limit, I see no value in having the
per-gather-node setting. So, yes, at that point, I would push to
rename the GUC.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
